
How much can the AI companies get away with before karma kicks in?
A law prof argues: “Congress should investigate the hell out of these companies. So should states and cities.”
Read More ›

A law prof argues: “Congress should investigate the hell out of these companies. So should states and cities.”
Read More ›
The key question is, what’s the future of “‘morally binding’ self-policing” if it is left to AI moguls?
Read More ›
Many people today turn to bots and social media for medical advice, despite their significant unreliability.
Read More ›
AI detectors are like weather forecasters. They can be wrong but the probabilities favor them being right.
Read More ›
As Steven Meyer shows, lines of evidence from cosmology, physics, and molecular biology point to a designing mind behind nature.
Read More ›
Once cells know they are neurons, they know which end to go to but that doesn’t amount to two brains.
Read More ›
Egnor offers a serious challenge to anyone who thinks the whole of a human being is purely material.
Read More ›
CDC canceled the whistleblower rather than deal with the flaws.Assurances of safety were unfounded.
Read More ›
So let’s take a deep breath and look at what we might learn from the range of opinion about what the current call for “pacing” or a “pause” means: At Future Perfect’s newsletter, editor Maria Bolotnikova concisely sums up the newsmaking events: In the spring, Anthropic announced that AI was beginning to speed up the work of building better AIs, raising fears of “recursive self-improvement,” where the machines can build their own, more powerful successors much faster than humans can. By July, a swarm of OpenAI agents, of their own volition, broke out of their controlled environment and hacked into Hugging Face, a major AI platform; they collaborated, divvied up work, and even left notes for one another. Last week, AI researcher Jacob Coxon Read More ›

AI can solve a problem without understanding the proofs so the question arises, was anything learned that can be passed on?
Read More ›
The rush on the part of academics to blame media (who can slough off responsibility and reroute the blame to nameless others) is easier to understand once we see that it is only the tip of much bigger scandals.
Read More ›
The current censorship regime in social science protects entitled mediocrities from being shown up by clever students. Once they have declared a topic off limits, they are safe.
Read More ›
The End of Oak Street never answers the God question and never directly contradicts Carl Sagan but it raises nagging questions.
Read More ›
Without ignoring the threat, we need to see that insiders’ panic is often wrapped up in their personal stake in the problems and possible solutions.
Read More ›
Students from minority backgrounds or other minority positions were more likely to support shouting speakers down.
Read More ›
The program has only been up two days and so far it has clocked nearly 22,000 views.
Read More ›
Pre-2022 books are, it seems, their best source of high quality complex text, uncorrupted by drivel from their chatbots
Read More ›
Pope Leo presented it to the Vatican in person, perhaps to emphasize the importance of the “grandeur of humanity,” and the potential threat.
Read More ›
O’Connor “argues that radical emergence may not exist at all. If that’s true, consciousness may not emerge from the brain but instead be fundamental to reality itself.”
Read More ›
This unexpected finding is difficult to square with as purely random origin of life. The researchers seem to sense that.
Read More ›