The challenge, moving on, is that better scholarship means listening to those who challenge conventional ideas instead of serially editing them.
Read More ›
We now await an army of predominantly middle-aged, bearded male philosophy graduates, out of work for the past 20 years, raising their wrists, thus pointing their fingers to the sky as they make the journey for an interview in Silicon Valley.
Read More ›
At one time, it was the less well-informed people who trusted science less. But repeated episodes like the Covid Crazy will mean that the better informed people will trust less.
Read More ›
Siegel’s essay at Big Think can have one very desirable result: It is a good, though unwitting, summary of attitudes that must change if public trust in science is to be improved.
Read More ›
If nature’s beginning has no explanation, the door is left open to embracing unexplained occurrences anywhere in nature, undermining the practice of science.
Read More ›
If being a scientist means that one must refuse to consider the evidence for design, it’s no wonder if many are looking for alternatives.
Read More ›
Explainaways protect the system from unwanted evidence by ignoring or dismissing it. But when the weight of such evidence grows, they stop sounding persuasive.
Read More ›
What these speculations point to is the way new findings have destroyed classical materialism. Materialism isn’t so much dying out as breaking up.
Read More ›
Shermer’s coverage of issues like the design inference and irreducible complexity is embarrassingly shallow.
Read More ›
Materialist theories intended to explain away NDEs need only sound plausible and scientific; they need not enlighten. A new one will be along shortly anyway.
Read More ›
At last, the end of materialism escapes the lecture room; it becomes a story about real people in real time in the midst of a civilizational struggle.
Read More ›
Initially, many scientists felt that non-locality or “action at a distance” was too spooky to be correct. But it is correct.
Read More ›
A downloadable audio file is available from Humanize of an interview with Olivier Bonnassies, author with Michel-Yves Bolloré of God: the Science, the Evidence (2025).
Read More ›
We seem a long way now from the once-dominant science view of eliminative materialism in which even human consciousness was not considered real.
Read More ›
Science is incompatible with the onslaught of post-modernism. A major rift in biology may be looming straight ahead.
Read More ›
The reason medical researchers now take NDEs seriously is a growing body of evidence that can’t just be tossed off with a simple explanation.
Read More ›
I was hardly prepared for what Bolloré and Bonnassies reveal about efforts to discredit the idea of a beginning to the universe — by any means necessary.
Read More ›
Despite a swamp of scandals, the focus of discussion seems to be getting the public to trust again, not reform of the system.
Read More ›
But today, the serious problem is not modernism and scientism, which are fading. It is post-modernism, which rejects reason and evidence.
Read More ›
On ID, it sounds like Grokipedia, unlike Wikipedia, follows the time-honored rule of letting people explain themselves and saving the commentary for later.
Read More ›