People can be agnostic on many things, such as historical events, like the authenticity of the moon landings, who shot JFK, or even the existence of the external world.
Read More ›
If the robot figures out that he isn’t returning to Earth with the crew, he might object to the plan and decide to continue the mission himself, just like he’d done with Bowman’s crew.
Read More ›
When Chandra finds the hidden order, he also finds Floyd’s message, which Bowman had discovered after turning off HAL
Read More ›
Making a story easy to follow isn’t just a matter of artistic preference; it’s tied to the suspension of disbelief and an audience member’s investment.
Read More ›
For the fans of 2001, the mystery is the point, and for those more devoted to secular causes, the concept of aliens as divine beings is the point.
Read More ›
For one thing, I disagree with the philosophy behind it. I don’t think evolution is true, and I certainly don’t think that death is a necessary part of life.
Read More ›
The movie ends with the baby staring at the earth, leaving the audience to either wonder what’s going on or what’s going to happen next.
Read More ›
Clarke seems to be going for something more religious: technology gives mankind the means to become God, and our alien overlords will be there to help once mankind is worthy.
Read More ›
Initially, many scientists felt that non-locality or “action at a distance” was too spooky to be correct. But it is correct.
Read More ›
Or just an end to conundrums that aren’t really conundrums if that fact is faced. There is a lot we could be doing with the same expenditure of time, energy, and intellectual skill.
Read More ›
Perhaps more of us should start calling out these assumptions that arise not from observing nature but from the intellectual commitments of those who make them.
Read More ›
He notes, if our brains evolved merely to help us stay alive, then it’s strange that those same mental states could invent the telescope to explore the cosmos.
Read More ›
The great Catholic theologian Aquinas noted that “what happens in the working of nature is either always, or mostly, for the better,” which rules out chance.
Read More ›
The doctrine of most religious traditions that the soul is not destroyed with the body is not presented as a comfort so much as a plain fact, with consequences.
Read More ›
If we want to play around with infinity concepts, we can have fun. But we can’t use them to decide what might or might not happen in our finite universe.
Read More ›
Georges Lemaître’s work provided the first interpretation of cosmological redshifts as a natural effect of the universe’s expansion within the framework of general relativity.
Read More ›
This book does not exhaustively survey the history of cosmology through the centuries, nor of the few decades that saw the development of relativistic cosmology
Read More ›
Hubble did provide evidence of an expanding universe, but he neither discovered such evidence nor accepted the radical idea that space itself was expanding.
Read More ›
There is plenty of evidence for the fine-tuning of the only universe we know. But, physicist Rob Sheldon says, there is still no evidence for a multiverse.
Read More ›
Guth tries explaining away fine-tuning via inflation and string theory but admits that fine-tuning is a “valid explanation” and “our only sensible explanation.”
Read More ›