_{If we are going to dedicate such a large portion of our children's lives to learning mathematics, we had better know why}_{
Jonathan Bartlett
March 21, 2022
6
Education, Mathematics
}

Modern policy discussions in America almost always leave out the biggest question – why are we doing what we are doing in the first place? Leaving out first principles always leaves people trying to find the most practical way to accomplish nothing in particular. We have become accustomed to not asking questions about first principles because they always sound too doctrinaire, but then we wind up, at best, making the misplaced assumption that everyone is reaching for the same goal, or, far worse, viewing the activities themselves as the goals. One place where this problem repeatedly rears its ugly head is education, and especially mathematics education. Why are we teaching math? What do we want people to get out of Read More ›

^{
Type
post
AuthorJonathan Bartlett
Date
March 31, 2021
Categorized
Education, Mathematics
Tagged
Common Core math, math curriculum, Mathematics, mathematics education, Mathematics education reform, New Math
}

_{Intuition relies on skill, not the other way around}_{
Jonathan Bartlett
March 31, 2021
6
Education, Mathematics
}

In 2010, a bold effort to reform math curriculum was adopted by the majority of the United States. Known as “Common Core Math,” the goal of this endeavor was to establish a common foundation of mathematics education across the country, and to help bolster not only students’ mathematical abilities, but also their mathematical intuition. The goal was to help students think about math more deeply, believing that this will help them work with mathematics better in later years. Before discussing problems with this approach, I want to say that I appreciate the idea of helping students think more deeply about mathematics. After years and years and years of mathematics education, many students wind up thinking about mathematics as merely a set Read More ›

^{
Type
post
AuthorJonathan Bartlett
Date
March 30, 2021
Categorized
Education, Mathematics
Tagged
education, math facts, Mathematics, mathematics education, number knock-out, skip counting, speed of recall, speed testing
}

_{How to help students make deeper connections within mathematics with creative games.}_{
Jonathan Bartlett
March 30, 2021
7
Education, Mathematics
}

Many people learn to hate math early on. One of the places where people learn to hate math first is in high-stakes speed testing for math facts. This has caused quite a bit of angst in mathematics education for people on both sides of this issue. On the one hand, some have advocated for getting rid of math facts memorization altogether. On the other hand, others have doubled-down, saying that we need speed tests in order to make sure that the cognitive load of arithmetic is limited for later mathematics work. While I fall more into the latter camp than the former, I do think that a more balanced approach to mathematics education may help students in the long run. Read More ›

^{
Type
podcast
AuthorRobert J. Marks
Date
March 18, 2021
Tagged
academia, Artificial Intelligence, Fermat's Last Theorem, Mathematics, scholarship
}

How are the fields of mathematics and academic research different today compared to years past? In this week’s podcast, Robert J. Marks and Gregory Chaitin discuss the challenges many mathematicians face today and the unfortunate trend toward bureaucracy that makes academic research difficult. Dropping names of mathematical geniuses past and present, they explore how technology and artificial intelligence are changing Read More ›

^{
Type
podcast
AuthorRobert J. Marks
Date
March 11, 2021
Tagged
Algorithmic Information Theory, Computer science, Fermat's Last Theorem, Gregory Chaitin, Kurt Gödel, Mathematics, Randomness
}

In the 1960s, mathematician and computer scientist Gregory Chaitin published a landmark paper in the field of algorithmic information theory in the Journal of the ACM – and he was only a teenager. Listen in as Robert J. Marks explores that paper with Chaitin, covering Chaitin’s definition of randomness and his philosophical interest in algorithmic information theory. Show Notes 00:27 Read More ›

^{
Type
post
AuthorJonathan Bartlett
Date
March 8, 2021
Categorized
Mathematics
Tagged
Algebra, calculus, George Berkeley (1685–1753), Mathematics
}

_{How 18th century mathematicians complicated calculus to avoid the criticisms of a bishop}_{
Jonathan Bartlett
March 8, 2021
7
Mathematics
}

Would you be surprised if I told you that the essentials of calculus are actually very straightforward and simple? Read More ›

^{
Type
podcast
AuthorRobert J. Marks
Date
March 4, 2021
Tagged
Algorithmic Information Theory, Computer science, Gregory Chaitin, Kurt Gödel, Leonard Euler, Mathematics
}

In this week’s Mind Matters episode, Robert J. Marks begins a conversation with mathematician and computer scientist Gregory Chaitin. The two discuss Chaitin’s beginnings in computer science, his thoughts on historic scientists in his field such as Leonard Euler and Kurt Gödel, and even the story of how a cold call to Gödel almost led to Chaitin meeting the famed Read More ›

^{
Type
podcast
AuthorRobert J. Marks
Date
September 24, 2020
Tagged
Abstract thought, Ada Lovelace, Alan Turing, Algorithm-of-the-Gaps, AlphaGo, Charles Babbage, Claude Shannon, Cognition, computer, Computers, Consciousness, Creativity, David Gelernter, disjunctive syllogism, Eugene Goostman, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Kurt Gödel, Language, Lovelace test, Marcel Proust, Mathematics, Natural Language Generation, Natural Language Processing, non-algorithmic, novels, ontological argument, ontological proof, Ray Kurzweil, Saint Anselm, Selmer Bringsjord, Singularity, Sports, Theorems, Turing Test
}

The Turing test, developed by Alan Turing in 1950, is a test of a machine’s ability to exhibit intelligent behaviour indistinguishable from a human. Many think that Turing’s proposal for intelligence, especially creativity, has been proven inadequate. Is the Lovelace test a better alternative? What are the capabilities and limitations of AI? Robert J. Marks and Dr. Selmer Bringsjord discuss Read More ›

^{
Type
post
AuthorMichael Egnor
Date
July 12, 2020
Categorized
Mathematics, Natural Intelligence, Philosophy of Mind
Tagged
___longform, Abstractions, Animal Intelligence, Bonobos, Designators, Featured, Gay A. Bradshaw, Language, Mathematics, Sue Savage-Rumbaugh, symbols
}

_{Are we just not being fair to animals, as some researchers think?}_{
Michael Egnor
July 12, 2020
8
Mathematics, Natural Intelligence, Philosophy of Mind
}

In 2007, Sue Savage-Rumbaugh, a psychologist and primatologist , published a paper in the Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science with a remarkable citation: Sue Savage-Rumbaugh, Kanzi Wamba, Panbanisha Wamba, and Nyota Wamba, “Welfare of Apes in Captive Environments: Comments on, and by, a Specific Group of Apes,” Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 10:1 (2007): 7–19. What is remarkable about the paper is not the text but the authorship statement. Kanzi, Panbanisha, and Nyota Wamba are not co-author colleagues—they’re apes, bonobos to be specific. Dr. Savage-Rumbaugh (right) is a controversial scientist who believes that animals have intellectual powers that can, under the right circumstances, rival the human intellect. She included her ape subjects as co-authors on the paper because Read More ›

^{
Type
post
AuthorNews
Date
May 10, 2020
Categorized
Artificial Intelligence, Mathematics, Religion
Tagged
___longform, Featured, Formal logic, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Kurt Gödel, Mathematics, Rene Descartes, Robert J. Marks, Saint Anselm, Selmer Bringsjord
}

_{A thought-provoking account of master logician Gödel’s largely unknown proof of the existence of God }_{
News
May 10, 2020
11
Artificial Intelligence, Mathematics, Religion
}

In an unsanitized, politically incorrect (but factual) history, Selmer Bringsjord talks about how the tormented genius Kurt Gödel took up a quest that dated back a thousand years to prove the existence of God by formal logic. His original version didn’t quite work but his editor’s version passed an important logic test.

^{
Type
podcast
AuthorRobert J. Marks
Date
May 7, 2020
Tagged
disjunctive syllogism, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Kurt Gödel, Mathematics, ontological argument, ontological proof, Saint Anselm, Selmer Bringsjord, Theorems
}

Kurt Gödel toppled a tall tower of mathematical reasoning with publication of his work showing no formal system of math could be both complete and consistent. He also gave a mathematical proof of the existence of God. Is Gödel’s proof valid? Robert J. Marks and Dr. Selmer Bringsjord discuss mathematics, Kurt Gödel, and the ontological argument. Show Notes 01:05 | Read More ›

^{
Type
post
AuthorJonathan Bartlett
Date
October 4, 2019
Categorized
Education
Tagged
Curves, Mathematics
}

_{Three mathematical curves explain a lot of what happens—and doesn’t happen—in everyday life }_{
Jonathan Bartlett
October 4, 2019
9
Education
}

One of the problems with modern secondary mathematics education is that it teaches lots of details about how to solve problems but provides very little insight into how to understand problems. You may have learned to solve a quadratic equation but you may not have learned what life situations generate a quadratic equation.

_{Often, in life as in calculus, when our implicit assumptions as to why something can’t be done are made explicit, they can be disproven}_{
Jonathan Bartlett
August 19, 2019
4
Education
}

Calculus textbooks are the most dry and boring presentations of mathematics I have ever seen, even though calculus offers some of the most amazing insights. Unfortunately, most mathematics texts teach only the mathematics, never the insights. Read More ›

^{
Type
post
AuthorJonathan Bartlett
Date
June 8, 2019
Categorized
Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning
Tagged
History of Ideas, Mathematics
}

_{The key to machine learning is not machines but mathematics}_{
Jonathan Bartlett
June 8, 2019
7
Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning
}

Machine learning is not a new technique, but is simply a modern extension of a tool that we have had in our toolbox since the days of the Babylonians. It continues to serve us well to help us extrapolate our data to estimate the value of unknown results and to help find the signal in noisy data.

^{
Type
post
AuthorNews
Date
April 10, 2019
Categorized
Mathematics, Work
Tagged
calculus, education, Jonathan Bartlett, Mathematics, philosophy of math, presuppositions
}

_{The flaw doesn't lead directly to wrong answers but it does create confusion}_{
News
April 10, 2019
4
Mathematics, Work
}

The lead author, Jonathan Bartlett, noted that the likely source of the bad notation was a philosophical issue. Because no one wanted to give differentials that same ontological status as other numbers, everyone presumed that the notational problems were simply the result of this fact, and no one pursued it further.

_{There is another way to prove a negative besides exhaustively enumerating the possibilities }_{
Eric Holloway
March 28, 2019
7
Artificial Intelligence, Philosophy of Mind
}

I am publishing, in three parts and with his permission, an exchange with Querius, who is looking for answers as to whether computers can someday think like people. In the first part, we discussed why human thinking cannot be indefinitely compressed. Here is the second part: Recapping for myself what I said in Part I and mulling it over: “If all symbol strings do have a shorter representation, then so must their shorter representations. Thus, we’d end up concluding that all symbol strings can be represented by nothing, which is incoherent.” Wait, I’m getting lost. “Therefore, we conclude that only some symbol strings have a compressed representation. As a consequence, compression intelligence is only true if the physical effects of Read More ›

^{
Type
post
AuthorRobert J. Marks
Date
March 19, 2019
Categorized
Natural Intelligence
Tagged
_longform, Computer science, Featured, Mathematics
}

_{The mathematics underlying our world is fascinating and full of surprises}_{
Robert J. Marks
March 7, 2019
13
Social Factors
}

In my experience, true STEM nerds are always pursuing some type of sizzle even in their spare time. Generally, the higher the academic degree, the greater the freedom STEM nerds have to pursue their sizzle of choice.

_{ How do you identify extroverted nerds? When you are talking to them, they look at YOUR shoes}_{
Robert J. Marks
January 29, 2019
7
Social Factors, Work
}

If I am made to confess that college courses in Shakespearean sonnets will make me a better person, then English literature majors had better confess that calculus makes them better people. Read More ›