Handwritten notes boost memory because it requires more thought than typing on a computer, also, one writes slower forcing one to process information more effectively.
Read More ›
If we reach the point where most people cannot muster the level of sustained attention needed to read a book, political changes unwelcome to many of us are inevitable.
Read More ›
Materialists cannot apply common standards for assessing evidence because they must refute all evidence of non-materialism. That makes them hard to argue with.
Read More ›
If academic papers in a discipline can be mostly AI written, why credential scholars anyway? Perhaps the discipline itself is obsolete.
Read More ›
Bubbles are created by speculators who don’t care about an asset’s income because they expect the price to keep rising. For most buyers, income is what counts.
Read More ›
The challenge, moving on, is that better scholarship means listening to those who challenge conventional ideas instead of serially editing them.
Read More ›
At the Brussels Signal, tech analyst Norman Lewis has been discussing a form of indoctrination that is becoming increasingly popular in the European Union, and doubtless elsewhere: prebunking — “a preventative measure that aims to prepare audiences to recognize and resist information risks.” (UNHCR) Prebunking is beloved of bureaucrats and you will hear a great deal about what a good thing it is from many sources — sources that should, under the circumstances, give pause for thought: ● “What Is Prebunking? It’s better to inoculate against disinformation than to debunk later.” (Psychology Today, 2021) ● “False information is everywhere. ‘Pre-bunking’ tries to head it off early” (NPR, 2022) ● “What is Pre-Bunking: The Power of Framing Before the Facts” (Simply Read More ›
Intellectual diversity is a key reason the public is expected to heed (and often pay for) universities. Apart from that, a university would not differ from a sect.
Read More ›
Significantly, no administrators who were contacted recommended reducing schools’ budget woes by reducing the number of administrators.
Read More ›
I’m sure the authors of these papers didn’t mean to pay ID any compliments, but everything we’ve seen here closely tracks with intelligent design literature.
Read More ›
Despite good reasons to be optimistic about reading’s ultimate survival, Horowitch and Harrington are putting their fingers on something real and concerning. Even for someone like me, who grew up reading books, the allure of digital distraction is often overpowering.
Read More ›
I spent 55 years as an eyewitness to this disaster, watching a relatively lean and efficient enterprise turn into a distended, barely recognizable caricature.
Read More ›
Many graduating students may just want a simpler life where they can work, afford to live, and enter life-giving relationships.
Read More ›
Automated writing leads to a decline in intellectual skills for the same reasons as automated walking would lead to a decline in motor skills.
Read More ›
High school students struggle in places afflicted with poverty, family breakdown, and other social woes. However, it doesn’t necessarily follow that students from wealthier regions are demonstrating academic excellence.
Read More ›
Together, Ducey, Ingraham, and Clark made a robust and compelling case at COSM for education freedom, with Ducey framing it as a matter of fairness.
Read More ›
I also believe that their programmed tendency to lead to addictive relationships makes them unsuitable for adults as well but that’s another topic.
Read More ›
Edify kids, don’t enhance them. We are organic beings, not gadgets to be improved with newer and better modules (like the newest computer chips).
Read More ›
Alpha School students are said to advance an average of 2.6× faster than peers on nationally normed MAP (Measures of Academic Progress) tests and frequently score in the 99th percentile.
Read More ›
AI should be used as a way of honing students’ skills and knowledge, helping them learn more effectively than before.
Read More ›