He documented the chaos and drama of our political life from the rare perspective of a conservative addressing a largely liberal audience.
Read More ›
Data centers will probably create jobs as well as eliminate them, which is usually what new technologies do, but environment concerns remain.
Read More ›
World political leaders like Donald Trump should be much more concerned about these developments; they could easily leap out of the lab.
Read More ›
Intellectual diversity is a key reason the public is expected to heed (and often pay for) universities. Apart from that, a university would not differ from a sect.
Read More ›
Science writer Matt Ridley offers some helpful information about why the “furin cleavage site” was a smoking gun for top scientists for a lab origin for Covid.
Read More ›
Fauci’s most revealing 1,141 pages are not a personal diary; despite all the personal material, he was writing at work on a government computer.
Read More ›
If you don’t want conflict or controversy, don’t pretend you want to be where the news is. And don’t be surprised if your platform mostly appeals to conventional people who all agree with each other.
Read More ›
In the Western tradition human rights have been said to exist independently of the state because they have been based upon human dignity.
Read More ›
Without this conviction there is no logical ground for supporting human rights in the United States or elsewhere; there is no logical ground for human rights at all.
Read More ›
The people who do not trust science today would probably like to be able to. And the people who do trust it may simply be unaware of the problems.
Read More ›
Instead of being expected to believe that human consciousness is an illusion, we may believe it exists — along with the cabbage mind and the electron mind.
Read More ›
If strategy is more important than ideology for accelerationists, that is probably because their aims are incoherent and their groups fragment easily.
Read More ›
On Saturday, I looked at Matt Johnson’s thoughts on George Orwell’s vital but comparatively unknown 1946 essay, “The Prevention of Literature.” Orwell, famous for Animal Farm (1945) and Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), wanted to “make political writing into an art.” He was well aware that most competitors for public attention simply wanted to make political writing a reliable form of mass brainwashing. He hoped to find a public that sought an alternative. He published “Prevention” (longish, at 5500 words) in Polemic, a short-lived British intellectual magazine (1945–47), which featured work by such notables as Henry Miller, Bertrand Russell, A. J. Ayer, and Dylan Thomas. Intellectual freedom as “violence” Intellectual freedom, as we have always been told, is only ever one generation Read More ›
In addition to imprisoning the operators of these criminal conspiracies, we should pass laws explicitly making it a crime to purchase organs from overseas
Read More ›
Burrows proposes an approach he calls “just preservation,” which would treat wild animals as the moral and legal equals of humans.
Read More ›
If more scientists follow Anna Krylov’s lead in simply severing ties from journals that are being politicized, reform may follow.
Read More ›
Science is incompatible with the onslaught of post-modernism. A major rift in biology may be looming straight ahead.
Read More ›
The episode is part of a much broader picture: When private truth beats public truth, ideology quickly overrules science.
Read More ›
Google says it was largely at the government’s behest. The Biden administration apparently believed in censorship far more than many Americans realized.
Read More ›
Two other panelists are Chapman University’s Mark Skousen and John Tamny, author of The Deficit Delusion (2025). George Gilder will moderate.
Read More ›