The real concern is that AI can find, combine, and carry out existing malicious techniques much faster and on a much larger scale than the human one.
Read More ›
Science writer Matt Ridley offers some helpful information about why the “furin cleavage site” was a smoking gun for top scientists for a lab origin for Covid.
Read More ›
If you don’t want conflict or controversy, don’t pretend you want to be where the news is. And don’t be surprised if your platform mostly appeals to conventional people who all agree with each other.
Read More ›
As an editor, I have often quietly substituted more reliable sources for information than Wikipedia when preparing various authors’ work for publication.
Read More ›
Thanks to AI chatbots, a phrase I probably coined phrase has become so recognizable that most people think C. S. Lewis himself said it!
Read More ›
In effect, therefore, this book is a call for a return to the medieval vision of a rational God who created rational creatures equipped to discover the verities of nature. In other words, to do science.
Read More ›
Here are a dozen tips for detecting fake and misleading articles about artificial intelligence.
Read More ›
On Saturday, I looked at Matt Johnson’s thoughts on George Orwell’s vital but comparatively unknown 1946 essay, “The Prevention of Literature.” Orwell, famous for Animal Farm (1945) and Nineteen Eighty-Four (1949), wanted to “make political writing into an art.” He was well aware that most competitors for public attention simply wanted to make political writing a reliable form of mass brainwashing. He hoped to find a public that sought an alternative. He published “Prevention” (longish, at 5500 words) in Polemic, a short-lived British intellectual magazine (1945–47), which featured work by such notables as Henry Miller, Bertrand Russell, A. J. Ayer, and Dylan Thomas. Intellectual freedom as “violence” Intellectual freedom, as we have always been told, is only ever one generation Read More ›
Owner Jeff Bezos has not yet succeeded in making the company financially viable in a time when so much media and journalism is now being independently created.
Read More ›
On ID, it sounds like Grokipedia, unlike Wikipedia, follows the time-honored rule of letting people explain themselves and saving the commentary for later.
Read More ›
Surprised? Joel Kotkin points out that the conventional picture many people have of the religious vs. the non-religious population is gravely distorted.
Read More ›
Shows like Kimmel’s and Colbert’s have long abandoned the usual attempts at humor, which has historically included taking jabs at both sides of the aisle.
Read More ›
Kirk openly invited dialogue and debate among people with different views and backgrounds. He always fought for others’ right to speak their minds.
Read More ›
Research presented at a 2025 Microsoft Research meet finds that people tend to think less carefully and critically when they rely on GenAI and online sources.
Read More ›
Weiss had resigned over her frustrations with censorship and bullying in legacy media. Those who laugh last laugh best.
Read More ›
It’s curious that so few notice a much more serious threat to science than current politics is: the calls that are coming from inside the house.
Read More ›
If we ingest a daily avalanche of shortform content, eventually we may feel starved for a good book, or a long, thematic movie that is actually about something.
Read More ›
As long as access to the internet continues, it is still easy to get around most restrictions. But no one should see this fact as a healthy news environment.
Read More ›
Fr. Martin Hilbert argues that causality — design, to use the more loaded term — is written deep into nature, and the best science demonstrates that.
Read More ›
As a veteran journalist puts it, once you build a co-dependence like that, you lose public trust. People are just not going to believe you.
Read More ›