
AI gen writing: Model collapse in slow motion
When more and more AI-generated writing floats around the internet, we start to realize what we are wading through.
Read More ›

When more and more AI-generated writing floats around the internet, we start to realize what we are wading through.
Read More ›
Unions are springing up in the tech sector. But is the 1930s strategy of unionization still the right one nearly a century later?
Read More ›
Researchers warn that, without intervention, bogus citations could impact scientific discovery, policy, and public understanding.
Read More ›
The bumblebee has only about one million neurons (humans have 86 billion). The number of neurons needed for complex behavior may be overestimated.
Read More ›
If we accept the idea of an underlying design in nature, we need not suppose that trees are conscious in order to understand their complex relationships.
Read More ›
We also tried an AI detector on copy from Mind Matters News…
Read More ›
Even as supersmart types get trapped in the “AI is becoming human” nonsense, a group of mathematicians is trying to Make Skepticism Normal Again.
Read More ›
Neurosurgeon Michael Egnor agrees; the image of storing and erasing memories is popular due to computer technology but not relevant to memory.
Read More ›
The calling is to be involved, to be on the site, with your hands in the work, and building with theological clarity and human dignity at the center.
Read More ›
The red flags were pretty obvious, actually. We should keep this in mind when we hear commentators extol the wonders of AI in health care.
Read More ›
If mathematics is discovered, not invented, the foundation of our universe is abstract, not concrete.
Read More ›
The very fact that a respectable discussion is beginning around this question tells us that something has changed.
Read More ›
The question isn’t whether AI will harm us. The question is actually whether we will remain human.
Read More ›Michael Egnor is being asked to speak in many venues as the result of the publication of his and Denyse O’Leary’s 2025 book, The Immortal Mind.
Read More ›
In effect, therefore, this book is a call for a return to the medieval vision of a rational God who created rational creatures equipped to discover the verities of nature. In other words, to do science.
Read More ›
Egnor continued to reference the scientific research at the foundation of his talk and repeatedly challenged his questioners.
Read More ›
Russian philosopher Nikolai Berdyaev long ago argued that human creativity springs from freedom — just what machines do not have.
Read More ›
Bradley’s ability to “live out loud” as a Christian without proselytizing deeply shaped those around him.
Read More ›
His paper, “Artificial General Intelligence Is Nowhere Near, Artificial Specific Stupidity Is Already Here,” challenges both hype and groundless fear.
Read More ›
Simply put, there is no gradualistic pathway to explain penguins…or cetaceans, or bats, or marine iguanas, etc., or almost anything else, as Behe made clear.
Read More ›