
An Unusual Story of Everything Review from the UK
The Telegraph reviewer, Peter Stanford, seems excited about The Story of Everything almost despite himself.
Read More ›
The Telegraph reviewer, Peter Stanford, seems excited about The Story of Everything almost despite himself.
Read More ›
A noxious racist, citing supposed genetic evidence of African racial inferiority, Watson’s work with DNA suggests that human beings can’t in fact be reduced to “genes.”
Read More ›
James Watson’s science legacy is for the ages. It would be fair if his ignoble thinking about faith and race faded into the background after some time.
Read More ›
Klinghoffer notes that the question, “Why there is something rather than nothing?” is also addressed in the new video, “Proof of God in 3 Minutes.”
Read More ›
As John West writes, “essentially OpenAI is using its technology as a replacement for human counselors and advisors.”
Read More ›
The theme that science is confirming the traditional philosophical understanding of life is also the theme of David Klinghoffer’s Plato’s Revenge.
Read More ›
Fr. Martin Hilbert argues that causality — design, to use the more loaded term — is written deep into nature, and the best science demonstrates that.
Read More ›
Today, people can be atheists and dismiss Darwin all the same. So Christian evangelists and apologists need to reckon with that.
Read More ›
Much like the Titanic, and a bit like the Titan, so much was expected at the glorious launch of the experiment in human reasoning.
Read More ›
In her usual forthright manner, theoretical physicist Sabine Hossenfelder asks, by blog post and Youtube video, “Why does science news suck so much? It’s hardly an original question but among her suggested answers are some thoughtful reflections, including 9. Don’t forget that science is fallible A lot of media coverage on science policy remembers that science is fallible only when it’s convenient for them. When they’ve proclaimed something as fact that later turns out to be wrong, then they’ll blame science. Because science is fallible. Facemasks? Yeah, well, we lacked the data. Alright. But that’d be more convincing if science news acknowledged that their information might be wrong in the first place. The population bomb? Peak oil? The new ice Read More ›