
Another blow to iconic Hollywood’s finances
The stifling of creativity that Cancel Culture imposes and the warping of classics that Wokeness inflicts are symptoms, not causes of decline.
Read More ›

The stifling of creativity that Cancel Culture imposes and the warping of classics that Wokeness inflicts are symptoms, not causes of decline.
Read More ›
If academic papers in a discipline can be mostly AI written, why credential scholars anyway? Perhaps the discipline itself is obsolete.
Read More ›
Simmons is, among other things, a disaster preparedness expert. He portrays the growing panic in and around Chicago as word of a potential nuclear blast leaks out.
Read More ›
If cognition can exist without a specific material substrate, one possible implication is that an underlying force seeks expression by whatever means are available.
Read More ›
This year, Harvard Magazine featured an article that asserts that the Democrats have lost key tech industry endorsements. Let’s see if that matters.
Read More ›
It’s easy to see why people might latch onto the idea of a reptilian brain as an explainer for complex topics. But the neuroscience underpinning it is just not that persuasive.
Read More ›
Community notes are usually the fate of people who pass on debunked or fake news. But Nature took that risk with its surprising approach to the Jason Arday tragedy/scandal.
Read More ›
The universe contradicts the eliminativist point of view. The laws that govern it are not physical things but they are real.
Read More ›
The challenge, moving on, is that better scholarship means listening to those who challenge conventional ideas instead of serially editing them.
Read More ›
At the Brussels Signal, tech analyst Norman Lewis has been discussing a form of indoctrination that is becoming increasingly popular in the European Union, and doubtless elsewhere: prebunking — “a preventative measure that aims to prepare audiences to recognize and resist information risks.” (UNHCR) Prebunking is beloved of bureaucrats and you will hear a great deal about what a good thing it is from many sources — sources that should, under the circumstances, give pause for thought: ● “What Is Prebunking? It’s better to inoculate against disinformation than to debunk later.” (Psychology Today, 2021) ● “False information is everywhere. ‘Pre-bunking’ tries to head it off early” (NPR, 2022) ● “What is Pre-Bunking: The Power of Framing Before the Facts” (Simply Read More ›

Computers are not conscious simply because they are programmed to make decisions; plants are likely in the same position.
Read More ›
Grieftech poses genuine problems when avatars seem to keep the deceased unchanged in a changing world — or change just when we want them to.
Read More ›
New information suggests that basic assumptions underlying many disciplines may be inadequate or mistaken. How they respond will predict their future.
Read More ›
When the young people inherit the world, they can start getting tough with misuse and abuse but first they should take the time to learn how it works.
Read More ›
Koch might wish to consider William James’s neglected theory of consciousness: the brain does not create the mind; it focuses it.
Read More ›
Without a subhuman, the human mind has no history. That is a serious blow to any Darwinian materialist project.
Read More ›
Driving, as such, did not offer protection from the dread dementia; needing to constantly map place coordinates quickly in real time seems to enlarge the hippocampus.
Read More ›
At one time, it was the less well-informed people who trusted science less. But repeated episodes like the Covid Crazy will mean that the better informed people will trust less.
Read More ›
Siegel’s essay at Big Think can have one very desirable result: It is a good, though unwitting, summary of attitudes that must change if public trust in science is to be improved.
Read More ›
For many media people, the revelations from Fauci’s papers are just something that needs explaining away. That is pretty much what they will continue to try to do.
Read More ›