On ID, it sounds like Grokipedia, unlike Wikipedia, follows the time-honored rule of letting people explain themselves and saving the commentary for later.
Read More ›
With Bolloré and Bonnassies’ work, reality-based thinking is coming back. And the reality is that the universe offers much evidence for God.
Read More ›
Ultimately, the AI knowledge system will be enriched or impoverished by human decisions, not by discovering a superintelligence.
Read More ›
Maybe but, when addressing the “something from nothing” problem, materialism typically degenerates into promissory materialism: one of these days…
Read More ›
Dementia is not “inevitable,” in the sense that it would happen no matter what else is in play. Nature is rarely like that. Decisions matter.
Read More ›
Carole Hooven discovered that, where the sex binary nature of humans is concerned, the new elite at Harvard and The Lancet thrive on nonsense. But she can’t.
Read More ›
One effect of the presumption of atheism in science is that all kinds of speculation can be grandfathered as reasonable scientific thinking.
Read More ›
Surprised? Joel Kotkin points out that the conventional picture many people have of the religious vs. the non-religious population is gravely distorted.
Read More ›
Science itself is being deplatformed by Woke relativism, developed by the very people who found atheists quite thought-provoking and fashionable.
Read More ›
NDEs do change lives but, according to a recent study, NDErs often require counseling and not many counselors are equipped to support them.
Read More ›
Because the local stones were not suitable for making larger tools, the early humans took to using elephant bones instead.
Read More ›
Materialists will try to interpret the workings of the brain as one aspect of consciousness that is a natural part of the material universe.
Read More ›
Why are we asked to discredit the evidence of fine-tuning of the universe? Why is such an antirealist message coming from science?
Read More ›
Earth appears uniquely suited to life. The question looms: How much can science downplay or avoid facts like that while retaining the character of science?
Read More ›
Human origins papers are often informative and entertaining, as long as we do not confuse them with understanding the realities of human origins and experience.
Read More ›
Something has changed if the magic word “Evolution!” cannot be used to paper over vast improbabilities and silence dissenters in the way that it has for over a century.
Read More ›
Much that the NDE experiencer learns cannot easily be expressed, because there are no words for experiences that most people have only after they die.
Read More ›
While Goodall believed that there is no sharp line dividing humans and chimpanzees, she herself was one of many who embodied the sharp line.
Read More ›
The episode is part of a much broader picture: When private truth beats public truth, ideology quickly overrules science.
Read More ›
If Michael Mann really wanted to avoid politicizing science, he could have at least started by setting an example.
Read More ›