Koch might wish to consider William James’s neglected theory of consciousness: the brain does not create the mind; it focuses it.
Read More ›
Egnor notes that intellect is the capacity to contemplate universals. In this respect, a human being is more different from an ape than an ape is from a virus.
Read More ›
Instead of being expected to believe that human consciousness is an illusion, we may believe it exists — along with the cabbage mind and the electron mind.
Read More ›
Even if we adopt a materialist view of the mind, I believe I can show why it is not possible for a machine to develop a mind.
Read More ›
Materialists will try to interpret the workings of the brain as one aspect of consciousness that is a natural part of the material universe.
Read More ›
Something has changed if the magic word “Evolution!” cannot be used to paper over vast improbabilities and silence dissenters in the way that it has for over a century.
Read More ›
Moreland contends thatthe dualist view isn’t an irrational leap of faith but a well-supported, philosophically robust position.
Read More ›
Goff’s eclectic philosophical journey is not likely over. But, generally, it is best to assume that the New Testament authors meant what they said.
Read More ›
Interestingly, Mitchell uses evolution to establish free will. Most uses of the concept would be to deny or diminish it, as in “We evolved to be violent,” etc.
Read More ›
The growth of panpsychism is likely to change the nature of the science problems that are considered hard. But we shall see.
Read More ›
Harris is the wife of well-known New Atheist neuroscientist Sam Harris, at one time one of the Four Horsemen of the New Atheist apocalypse.
Read More ›
People offer different accounts of how it comes to exist but that is a different matter.
Read More ›
Efforts to jam both feet into time have gone nowhere and are likely to continue to do so.
Read More ›
And Happy New Year to our readers, who make our work possible and worthwhile!
Read More ›
The idea that plants can “feel” things, based on their complex reactions, may stem from a misunderstanding of categories of consciousness.
Read More ›
Before dismissing the idea as untestable, we should ask, is the idea that consciousness is an illusion, grounded in Darwinian evolution theory, testable?
Read More ›
Aboitiz concludes, “In the end, the dualistic dilemma between subjective experience and mechanistic explanations seems to me inescapable.”
Read More ›
Darwinism’s failure to simply *eliminate* the human mind, as promised, enabled a Pandora’s box of materialist claims for consciousness in all life forms.
Read More ›
The concern Michael Egnor expresses, that materialism, while barren, may be replaced by something worse, may be prescient, depending on how panpsychism unfolds.
Read More ›
As Kuhn marvels, Josephson reasons his way to precisely the sorts of conclusions generally accepted in major world religions.
Read More ›