Bahnsen sees attacks on capitalism as the denigration of hopes and dreams, of job opportunities and growth.
Read More ›
The magician can show you something extraordinary. But only your mind can decide what you’ve seen, what it means, and whether it rises to Wow!
Read More ›
The simplest solution to last week’s question involves preventing a royal flush.
Read More ›
The solution to the puzzle about cutting the fan belt is to remember that there is only ever one side.
Read More ›
Longtermism — making decisions based on assumptions about a far distant future where everything might be different — makes no sense.
Read More ›
People are often superstitious—baseball players are among the worst for this—and that causes us to imagine statistical relationships.
Read More ›
Anthropomorphism has nothing to do with electronics as such. But there are new perils.
Read More ›
Not as a computer guy but as a litigation lawyer, I’m looking at the Hugging Face intrusion incident in July 2026.
Read More ›
Materialists cannot apply common standards for assessing evidence because they must refute all evidence of non-materialism. That makes them hard to argue with.
Read More ›
So let’s take a deep breath and look at what we might learn from the range of opinion about what the current call for “pacing” or a “pause” means: At Future Perfect’s newsletter, editor Maria Bolotnikova concisely sums up the newsmaking events: In the spring, Anthropic announced that AI was beginning to speed up the work of building better AIs, raising fears of “recursive self-improvement,” where the machines can build their own, more powerful successors much faster than humans can. By July, a swarm of OpenAI agents, of their own volition, broke out of their controlled environment and hacked into Hugging Face, a major AI platform; they collaborated, divvied up work, and even left notes for one another. Last week, AI researcher Jacob Coxon Read More ›
The question of how to recognize a discovery without any criterion for recognition turned out to be Meno’s Paradox, from Plato’s dialogues.
Read More ›
AI can solve a problem without understanding the proofs so the question arises, was anything learned that can be passed on?
Read More ›
The intelligence, understanding, and logical reasoning of ChatGPT and other LLMs continue to be limited by their inability to connect words to the real world.
Read More ›
Meanwhile, some are asking if Claude’s Navier–Stokes proof really originated with a researcher and a math prof using the system.
Read More ›
Weddings, funerals, breakups at 2 a.m. — one song always shows up: “I Will Always Love You.” Whitney Houston sent it into the stratosphere. Lorelai Gilmore poured it out on Gilmore Girls. Yet it arose out of Dolly Parton’s soul in 1974, pure emotion turned into melody, lyrics, and musical history. So it’s Dolly’s song, right? It’s hers, she wrote it, she can license it, she can get paid for it. Right? Not according to attorney Stephan Kinsella. His 2025 article, “The Problem with Intellectual Property,” argues that Dolly shouldn’t have any rights to her own song. By that logic, she owns the paperclip holding her sheet music more than she owns the song itself. The movement to abolish your Read More ›
To answer last Monday’s tree planting dilemma, look for shapes other than squares.
Read More ›
29 states sued Meta, alleging that its platforms were designed to be addictive and users were misled about the risks.
Read More ›
Community notes are usually the fate of people who pass on debunked or fake news. But Nature took that risk with its surprising approach to the Jason Arday tragedy/scandal.
Read More ›
Bubbles are created by speculators who don’t care about an asset’s income because they expect the price to keep rising. For most buyers, income is what counts.
Read More ›
The answer to last week’s “count the squares” puzzle can be turned into a formula that can be applied to any number of dimensions.
Read More ›