Gödel’s theorem started by upending mathematics nearly a century ago by showing that it is impossible to create a mathematical Theory of Everything.
Read More ›
While none of this research is decisive, the materialist paradigm is challenged by awareness in PVS. The dualist perspective better fits the evidence.
Read More ›
It’s a lot to ask of one type of cell, however unique, that it be what makes humans more intelligent than chimpanzees and that it create language.
Read More ›
If it takes a hundred scientists to map a cubic millimetre of a mouse’s brain, even the material world — never mind the immaterial world of the mind — is not likely to have a simple explanation.
Read More ›
Many philosophers have concluded both from experience and careful consideration that mental phenomena cannot be reduced to neural mechanisms.
Read More ›
Material cells can only make decisions if specifically structured to follow a blueprint with rules of engagement. Where is the blueprint?
Read More ›
Whether they continue to push the boundary, or someone else does, they can only bring up so many unaccounted-for facts before it’s time for a revolution.
Read More ›
Teilhard noted the same weakness in evolution theory as Thomas Nagel does today: Excluding the origin of mind and consciousness makes it at best half a theory.
Read More ›
His writings caught the imagination of many religiously minded people but they seemed more profound than they really were.
Read More ›
While it is quite true that the human brain is very large by animal standards, there is no simple one-on-one relationship between brain size and intelligence.
Read More ›
Real-world research shows the remarkable resilience of damaged brains housing single minds. Our brains are full of complexities and exceptions to rules.
Read More ›
Of his 55,000 brain stimulations that “activated complex networks,” not one generated abstract thought — implying that it is not a “product” of the brain.
Read More ›
A recent research paper looks at the way minds work with what’s available, something I often encounter in my practice as a neurosurgeon.
Read More ›
Darwinian evolution theory allows any state of affairs that dates to eons ago to be called “evolution” even when, as in this case, the facts imply the opposite.
Read More ›
The view Murphy outlines at Closer to Truth has more in common with modern materialism than with a traditional Christian understanding of the human soul.
Read More ›
The question naturally arises, was the normally developed human mind ever incapable of abstract thought? That’s a challenge to accepted evolution theories.
Read More ›
If examples of terminal and paradoxical lucidity in old age are any guide, we should not conclude that children must lack consciousness before a given stage.
Read More ›
Is science about following the evidence or about confirming a materialist ideology about science? This is the big neuroscience question of our century.
Read More ›
The higher human ability to think abstractly — to reason and will freely — are not physical abilities and do not come from the brain.
Read More ›
Understanding the mind in terms of information processing, rather than as a byproduct of brain activity, could reshape the debate.
Read More ›