
At a Science Journal: Humanity Is Just So Doomed
Opinions differ as to the details of what will wipe us all out — or maybe notIn one version, the coming human eclipse originated in a sin against Darwinism: destroying the competition.
Read More ›
In one version, the coming human eclipse originated in a sin against Darwinism: destroying the competition.
Read More ›
With all the talk of morality, I was particularly struck by a category of moral “patients” he fails to discuss: gestating human babies.
Read More ›
From a secular humanist perspective, he says roughly what Aristotle (384– 322 BC) and Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274) would say about our unique human nature.
Read More ›
The researchers have set out to show that bonobos have a theory of mind. Are they willing to consider that dogs might have a similar theory of mind?
Read More ›
Oppression, genocide, discrimination, slavery, and other evils arise from refusing to see us all as equals based upon our common humanity.
Read More ›
Cat intelligence is often underrated but the human mind belongs to an entirely different order of being from the feline mind.
Read More ›
The comparison doesn’t really work but it underlines the *doctrine* that human intelligence is just another type of animal intelligence.
Read More ›
The assumed equivalence between animal behavior and the human mind is a feature of contemporary science beliefs, not of evidence.
Read More ›
He told colleagues he is planning a new book, tentatively titled “Why Liberals Should Ditch Darwin and Consider Intelligent Design.”
Read More ›
Neanderthals cannot be the missing link that many paleontologists are looking for. But if the human mind has no history, there is no missing link.
Read More ›
It’s not stone tool use that is exclusive to humans; vultures can do that. It’s the ability to form abstract ideas — like the study of tool use among animals.
Read More ›
In reality, where language is concerned, there is a vast gulf fixed. It is not between primates and other mammals but between humans and all other life forms.
Read More ›
The study, along with recent studies of Neanderthal tools and stone circles, is making the idea that they were intellectually inferior increasingly untenable.
Read More ›
Our intelligence interacts dynamically with our environment in a way that machine intelligence doesn’t.
Read More ›
This recent find in evolution studies is strikingly negative. There is no physical limitation to chimpanzee speech; rather, the limitation is a mental one.
Read More ›
We learn nothing specific here about how our remote ancestors thought but we have learned something useful: Big Think sees this as cutting edge science.
Read More ›
Aboitiz concludes, “In the end, the dualistic dilemma between subjective experience and mechanistic explanations seems to me inescapable.”
Read More ›
Plant philosophy seeks to change the definitional understandings of “intelligence” to elevate the moral status of plants relative to humans.
Read More ›
Humans have reason and ethics and other animals don’t, and there is no evidence that these qualities — that shape our societies — simply “evolved.”
Read More ›
The “human evolution” narrative that ignores the critical distinction handicaps the thinking of philosopher Hugh Desmond and many others.
Read More ›