
Philosopher: Why Brain Science Does Not Eliminate Free Will
Tim Bayne looks at what we can logically deduce from the famous Libet experimentsThe logical argument for free will coincides with recent neuroscience research findings.
Read More ›

The logical argument for free will coincides with recent neuroscience research findings.
Read More ›
Canadian media that accept Trudeau’s handouts must please the regime more than inform the public. Indies are under heavy fire.
Read More ›
The fate of the discipline may depend on how committed researchers are to finding out the facts vs. protecting a materialist view of consciousness.
Read More ›
Cancel Culture at universities aims to protect a set of core beliefs from challenge by new evidence. If a discipline is to thrive, it must defeat the Cancel mob
Read More ›
If panpsychism continues to gain ground, the human mind can at last be acknowledged to exist — along with the cabbage mind and possibly the electron mind.
Read More ›
A few Big Tech players control the chatbot market. Could bargaining with them for something like Public Lending Right resolve the writers’ issues?
Read More ›
The COVID lockdowns often introduced people to a different approach to time from what they were used to, with mixed results.
Read More ›
The dog’s life is easier than human life in some ways; if he isn’t in trouble with humans or other dogs, everything is fine.
Read More ›
He blames our “folk intuitions” for the problem. Some thinkers would say that the problem arises from seeking a materialist solution to an immaterial reality.
Read More ›
The most reasonable theory of how the universe can be both uncertain at its base and yet reliable in everyday life is the least popular one: deism or theism.
Read More ›
AI companies could be required to record images’ origin and compensate copyright holders. But as Robert J. Marks notes, end users might then have to pay.
Read More ›
Ethan Siegel offers a fantasy representation of the science world. It may comfort him but it might provoke knowledgeable people to trust science even less.
Read More ›
Humans have reason and ethics and other animals don’t, and there is no evidence that these qualities — that shape our societies — simply “evolved.”
Read More ›
If there is no free will, you can’t say “I didn’t do it” if sociologically, you have a higher probability of doing it than someone else might.
Read More ›
“Evolution” theories about the human mind play a key role in the manufacture of non-knowledge posing as knowledge, and we are urged to treat them as knowledge.
Read More ›
No one knows how animal knowledge of this sort is transmitted. Genetics? Environment? Design in nature? It’s not new and it is still a mystery.
Read More ›
The “human evolution” narrative that ignores the critical distinction handicaps the thinking of philosopher Hugh Desmond and many others.
Read More ›
What benefits does the presumption of atheism provide? So many disciplines reel under peer review scandals while trust in science has diminished over the years.
Read More ›
It’s telling that the obvious evidence for the fine-tuning of the universe, implying design, is — in sharp contrast — evaluated in a hypercritical way.
Read More ›
Humans can tolerate mysteries quite well as long as we can fill them in with speculations, which in the end tell us mostly about ourselves.
Read More ›