
Discussion with Michael Egnor elicits wide interest among Spanish speakers
The program has only been up two days and so far it has clocked nearly 22,000 views.
Read More ›
The program has only been up two days and so far it has clocked nearly 22,000 views.
Read More ›
Egnor observes, “If there is no free will, “morality” is only an illusion projected by the meatware of our brains.
Read More ›Michael Egnor is being asked to speak in many venues as the result of the publication of his and Denyse O’Leary’s 2025 book, The Immortal Mind.
Read More ›
On this episode of the Mind Matters News podcast, host and neurosurgeon Dr. Michael Egnor welcomes Michael Shermer, historian of science and founder of Skeptic magazine, to discuss Shermer’s new book Truth: What It Is, How to Find It, and Why It Still Matters. The conversation quickly evolves into a deep philosophical debate between Egnor and Shermer over whether truths about morality and the universe are created by humans or discovered as objective features of reality.
Read More ›
Egnor continued to reference the scientific research at the foundation of his talk and repeatedly challenged his questioners.
Read More ›
Near-death experiences are challenging — not science — but the materialist presumption that has dominated for many decades in science.
Read More ›
Michael Egnor adds that classical philosophers defined love as “willing the good of the other,” not merely liking someone and Stephen Post agrees.
Read More ›
Suggesting a trend, a new book which aims to dethrone materialism in science, has been selling well in Europe and coming out shortly in English.
Read More ›
People I work with in the operating room and clinics and even patients tell me that they read our book and really liked it. They are glad we are speaking up.
Read More ›
He noted that pioneer neurosurgeon Wilder Penfield started out as a materialist but became a dualist as a result of discovering things like these.
Read More ›
About existential questions, he says, “I no longer settled for the stock answers that many scientists, like me, had naively accepted for so long.”
Read More ›
On today’s episode, Dr. Michael Egnor reads the Introduction to his new book, co-authored with Denyse O’Leary, The Immortal Mind: A Neurosurgeon’s Case for the Existence of the Soul, now available from Worthy Books. In this reading, Dr. Egnor shares his journey from being a medical student who believed science could explain everything, including how consciousness emerges from the brain and Read More ›

One thing that stood out was the commenters’ appreciation of a cordial discussion of often-controversial topics.
Read More ›
At one point, the discussion turned on the case of a girl who had her sense of guilt removed surgically. What does that prove about the mind and the brain?
Read More ›
Egnor describes faith as a deep relationship that may not always yield happiness about life circumstances but fosters lasting joy, independent of circumstances.
Read More ›
In their book, The Immortal Mind, Egnor and O’Leary argue that an immaterial, immortal soul best explains human consciousness, free will, and abstract thought.
Read More ›
He makes the case—based on 40 years of practice and over 7,000 brain surgeries—that science has gotten it all wrong about the soul.
Read More ›
In this episode, Pat Flynn and Dr. Michael Egnor conclude their discussion of Dr. Egnor’s contribution to the recent volume Minding the Brain. Flynn and Dr. Egnor discuss Thomistic dualism and its relation to neuroscience and the soul. Thomistic dualism is the belief that the soul is a separate entity from the body and that the rational aspects of the soul, Read More ›

Egnor talks about the demand for materialist conformity: “If I were a basic scientist and I relied on grants to live, I’d be toast.”
Read More ›
In this episode, Pat Flynn and Dr. Michael Egnor continue their discussion of Dr. Egnor’s contribution to the recent volume Minding the Brain. Flynn and Egnor discuss various criticisms of materialism in neuroscience. They touch on topics such as near-death experiences, the limitations of the computational theory of mind, and the nature of artificial intelligence. Dr. Egnor also addresses common questions Read More ›