Unlike organizations on the other side of this issue, anti-assisted-suicide work doesn’t have the backing of billionaires like George Soros.
Read More ›
Policy-makers should pass laws declaring that only humans and our associations are entitled to rights and standing in courts.
Read More ›
27% of Canadians strongly or moderately agree that euthanasia is acceptable for suffering caused by “poverty” and 28% for suffering caused by homelessness.
Read More ›
We can’t allow policies about some of the most powerful and potentially dangerous technologies ever invented to be left to the supposed moral “experts.”
Read More ›
The editors of Nature are destroying a once venerable and important science journal. That’s bad for science, which is bad for the world. Shame.
Read More ›
The zoo, where the elephants have lived for years, has a sterling reputation but the advocates believe that they know better what elephants would want.
Read More ›
What the country really needs is a strong Supreme Court decision unequivocally reinvigorating the free-exercise clause by overturning Employment Division v Smith
Read More ›
Dementia is not politically sensitive. But if the topic were, say, gender dysphoria, would honesty be likewise demanded? No wonder so many doubt science now.
Read More ›
What many people are really craving isn’t “interesting” experiences but meaning. But sources of meaning like faith, family, community, country, have decayed.
Read More ›
Execution by nitrogen inhalation is another example of what I call cruel and unusual death with dignity.
Read More ›
Organ harvesting as the means of euthanasia has already been proposed in a major bioethics journal.
Read More ›
I would be surprised if anything came of it. Authorities rarely have the gumption to seriously punish suicide assistance unless in involves a teenager.
Read More ›
The longer the euthanasia movement is held at bay, the more likely that America can avoid becoming a culture of death like that in Canada.
Read More ›
Increasingly, those who claim to be science’s greatest defenders do the sector wrong by becoming highly ideological and progressively partisan.
Read More ›
China has denied the accusation repeatedly, but multiple international studies and exposés have substantiated the brutality with strong circumstantial evidence.
Read More ›
Choosing Rachel Levine and Seema Yasmin as keynoters reveals how one-sidedly ideological the AAP has become on issues of great cultural importance.
Read More ›
Lately, columns in professional journals have argued repeatedly that our most contentious political controversies be redefined into issues of public health.
Read More ›
Germany’s highest court declared a fundamental right to commit or assist in a suicide for any reason, possibly excepting children.
Read More ›
Rather than simplifying our lives, the internet has made our lives more complicated, what with having to continually change passwords, the use of multiple security levels, the threat of hacking, and the like. Now, with the threat of AI creating fraudulent content, some technologists are proposing “personhood credentials” to thwart incursions and impersonations. From the MIT Technology Review story: Personhood credentials work by doing two things AI systems still cannot do: bypassing state-of-the-art cryptographic systems, and passing as a person in the offline, real world. To request credentials, a human would have to physically go to one of a number of issuers, which could be a government or other kind of trusted organization, where they would be asked to provide evidence that they’re Read More ›
The report discusses long-term health risks and malpractice issues, demonstrating how the conjoining of big profits and radical ideology is a toxic mix.
Read More ›