He also promoted Vitamin A and oft-neglected strategies like a balanced diet for reducing measles mortality. Is he making science matter again?
Read More ›
A properly balanced relationship with expertise won’t be restored by imposing autocratic consensus rules. “Science” really needs less hubris and more humility.
Read More ›
Few people who are not already fixated on global warming will care what doctors may think about it; most would rather their doctors stick to medicine.
Read More ›
Predictably, assisted suicides are provided under ever-lessening oversight, to ever-expanding cadres of the eligible, leading eventually to death on demand.
Read More ›
Oppression, genocide, discrimination, slavery, and other evils arise from refusing to see us all as equals based upon our common humanity.
Read More ›
Usefully, however, the Oregon bill also requires hospices to say whether they participate in assisted suicide, contrary to hospice founders’ intentions.
Read More ›
“Strict guidelines” against abuse sell such laws to the public but they are never the ceiling of permissibility. The rules are loosened more and more.
Read More ›Legislation like this must be carefully written because assisted-suicide activists frequently redefine terms and obfuscate crucial distinctions.
Read More ›
much of the advocacy is about imposing ideology on what should be scientific practices
Read More ›
Proponents argue that the patient should be bound by the directive even if he wants to eat and drink; this softens the public up for death by lethal injection.
Read More ›
Nature rights is an ideological statement demoting mankind into just another animal in the forest.
Read More ›
Associated Press, covering for the transgender lobby, is all yesterday’s news, akin to a million-year-old mosquito stuck in amber.
Read More ›
It is way past time for the overburdened courts to dismiss these animal standing cases out of hand at the trial court level.
Read More ›
This article is reprinted from National Review with the permission of the author. President Trump has withdrawn the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO) because of its Covid failings, allegations of being soft on China, and the disproportionate share of funding borne by the United States. There is even more wrong in how WHO leaders have wielded their influence. In recent years, the organization has not just been about promoting public-health internationally, but also in using its clout to impose woke cultural agendas on the world — including areas that have traditional moral values — and in seeking to construct an international technocracy. Item: WHO sought to force a radical abortion regime on the world by allowing abortion through the Read More ›
More than 15,000 people died in Canada in one year because they couldn’t access care in the country’s collapsing socialized health-care system.
Read More ›
Nat Hentoff paid a steep price for his pro-life advocacy, losing his decades-long Village Voice column and suffering other career sanctions.
Read More ›
By attending a suicide party or ceremony, we validate the decision and, in so doing, become complicit in that death.
Read More ›
Lawfare and the resulting usurpation of public policy by courts allows the elites to decide environmental policies by diktat.
Read More ›
If Italy accepts the bioethics’ commission’s advice, it will join a growing list of countries that are taking steps to end the practice.
Read More ›
Journalist Michael Grunwald points out that factory farming means fewer natural spaces are cleared for farmland than would otherwise be the case.
Read More ›