Mind Matters Natural and Artificial Intelligence News and Analysis
view-of-mount-taranaki-taranaki-maunga-from-lake-mangamahoe-596280750-stockpack-adobe_stock
View of Mount Taranaki (Taranaki Maunga) from Lake Mangamahoe, Egmont National Park, on the west coast of New Zealand's North Island.
Image Credit: Luis - Adobe Stock

New Zealand Mountain Named a Person with Rights, Responsibilities

And what responsibilities can the mountain possibly assume? Can it be sued for an avalanche?
Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email

This article is reprinted from National Review with the permission of the author.

A mountain sacred to the indigenous people of the island has been named a “person” with “rights” and “responsibilities.” From the AP story:

The law passed Thursday gives Taranaki Maunga all the rights, powers, duties, responsibilities and liabilities of a person. Its legal personality has a name: Te Kāhui Tupua, which the law views as “a living and indivisible whole.” It includes Taranaki and its surrounding peaks and land, “incorporating all their physical and metaphysical elements.”

A newly created entity will be “the face and voice” of the mountain, the law says, with four members from local Māori iwi, or tribes, and four members appointed by the country’s Conservation Minister.

This is irrational and illustrates how environmentalism is going off the rails. A geological feature has been declared to be a living person! Again!

As I have written repeatedly, this movement is not limited to honoring indigenous mystical beliefs. “Nature rights” is part of the negotiations for a new U.N. environmental treaty. “Nature” has been accorded “rights” in several countries and more than 30 U.S. municipalities, including Santa Monica — where very little of nature still exists. Why? Because it is an ideological statement demoting mankind into just another animal in the forest.

And what responsibilities can the mountain possibly assume? Can it be sued for an avalanche? Ridiculous!

Look, I have absolutely no problem with laws that set aside large tracts of nature for conservation and protection against human uses. If the government of New Zealand wants to honor the Māori and make up for colonialism by protecting an indigenous sacred place, fine and good. But those public policy goals can be accomplished by declaring the mountain to be a nature sanctuary or national park — much as we have with Yellowstone. After all, we are protecting Old Faithful quite well without declaring the volcanic feature to be a person with rights.

The nature rights movement is spreading around the world and too many people still don’t take it seriously.


Wesley J. Smith

Chair and Senior Fellow, Center on Human Exceptionalism
Wesley J. Smith is Chair and Senior Fellow at the Discovery Institute’s Center on Human Exceptionalism. Wesley is a contributor to National Review and is the author of 14 books, in recent years focusing on human dignity, liberty, and equality. Wesley has been recognized as one of America’s premier public intellectuals on bioethics by National Journal and has been honored by the Human Life Foundation as a “Great Defender of Life” for his work against suicide and euthanasia. Wesley’s most recent book is Culture of Death: The Age of “Do Harm” Medicine, a warning about the dangers to patients of the modern bioethics movement.
Enjoying our content?
Support the Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence and ensure that we can continue to produce high-quality and informative content on the benefits as well as the challenges raised by artificial intelligence (AI) in light of the enduring truth of human exceptionalism.

New Zealand Mountain Named a Person with Rights, Responsibilities