Tag: Pro-life advocacy and peer review

Team of scientists working in a laboratory, carefully conducting experiments and analyzing data. Generative AI

^{Type
post

Author
Denyse O'Leary
Date
January 17, 2024

Categorized
Peer Review

Tagged
Abortion advocacy and peer review, Campbell’s Law, Carole Hooven, Cynthia Hudson Vitale, Fertility, Goodhart’s Law, Harvard University and peer review, Laszlo Bencze, Leslie D. McIntosh, Pregnancy and Mental Health - a Behavioral and Biomedical Perspective, Pro-life advocacy and peer review, Robert J. Marks on peer review}

A Case Study in Why Peer Review May Be Unreformable

_{McIntosh and Hudson Vitale illustrate, by their very zeal to eliminate pro-life researchers, the built-in corruption of the peer review process} _{Denyse O'Leary

January 17, 2024

5

Peer Review}

The excruciating difficulty for peer review is Goodhart’s Law: “When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.” Bias makes it all worse. Read More ›