We must be very careful to mind our language during everyday life and how you infer the news that’s implied regarding the ‘media is the message’.

A corrupted commentary or concept can lead people astray, cause them fear, and send out the wrong meaning on profound matters, which we must reflect on when we receive comments by those in ‘authority’. It is those in authority who inherited mendacity from some of our deviant, corrupt, treasonous, enabling ancestors.

To give some examples, the so-called Church sex abuse scandals is arguably one of the worst, leading many followers to lose their faith and some innocent priests falsely framed and imprisoned to gain financial compensation for accusers: When Priests Are Falsely Accused: The Mirror of Justice Cracked — Beyond These Stone Walls

There is no such thing as Church scandals. The Church is the Magisterium, the Bride of Christ, and that cannot be corrupt. The proper term to use is ‘the hijacked, infiltrated Vatican (which is the HQ of the Church) and hijacked infiltrated world dioceses (the Vatican’s outposts worldwide) scandals, run by human beings prone to committing sins. And not all clerics are involved.

Also, the deviant lapsed priests who carried out such vile crimes against predominantly young boys, were by nature anti-Christian evildoers by breaking their vows after being ordained. What would Jesus say about these men if he returned to Earth?

Take for example the genetic fallacy. This is an illogical argument based on the origin of an idea and a bias for those who want to demonise someone or prove something.

An example of a genetic fallacy is the statement, “2 + 2 cannot equal 4 because my maths teacher, who used to abuse me, told me it to be true.” The maths teacher may have been a horrible person, but it doesn’t necessarily follow that his equations don’t make sense because of the hurt he once caused to a past pupil.

Evil monsters can sometimes be right; also, maths cannot physically or mentally abuse anyone. I wrote about the fallacy here: The Curse of the Genetic Fallacy and Bad Theology – New English Review.

Then there is the theory of the Big Bang. Most people seem to think that these words refer to something that created the universe. The Big Bang is a metaphor for a universe popping into existence out of nothing natural, ontologically prior to time, space and matter.

The big religiously neutral question is: Who is the Big Banger that set off the fuse for the Big Bang to ‘explode’? And the only logical answer is an all-powerful eternal Mind. This drives atheists crazy because it implies the supernatural does exist.

As for evolution: Not to be confused with the children’s fairy tale of Darwinian Evolution, regular evolution does exist on a physical micro level, as well as a mental level when our views evolve.

Sea sponges don’t evolve into men who paint images on the celling of the Sistine Chapel, build Spain’s Sagrada Familia cathedral, or write the classic novels of yore. As for apes: They seem to be taking a long time to evolve. When was the last time you saw one weeping during an opera?

An example of a harmless misused word is ‘literally’. We sometimes hear football commentators say the team was ‘literally taken to the cleaners’. This would suggest that a group of athletes were physically taken to a laundry.

But from the harmless to the dangerous: “Trust the science.” Really? In an age were most of the ‘science’ has become politicised or a mechanism to gain enormous grants, what passes for science today is ‘scientism’.

Wasn’t it Anthony Fauchi who coined the phrase “Trust the science”? A man who invoked the Fifth Amendment more than 100 times during a July 29, 2026 Senate hearing to avoid answering questions about the ‘COVID-19 pandemic’ response. He should’ve been asked: “Can you invoke the Fifth Amendment again if you are guilty, so as I can rest my case.”

Regarding news, many people are guilty of gullibility. When a TV or radio newsreader (a State-sponsored propaganda activist) says ‘scientists have found life on Mars’, the viewer will often say to friends or colleagues, “Have you heard scientists have found life on Mars?” That is because the newsreader implies, while the listener infers the news as fact. The newsreader should’ve said, “Scientists have claimed that they’ve found life on Mars, but it’s yet to be proven.”

More: In recent times it’s been said that “AI will one day be able to read your thoughts.” Incorrect: AI can detect brain signals, but it cannot read your mind/thoughts.

Metaphorically, AI is the apple, while the mind is an orange. It’s like someone having two plugs pressing against each other trying desperately to spark an electrical current, ditto two sockets pressing against each other. The spark of electricity will not occur.

On AI: The language/message from some hi-tech high priests who preach about AI being able to read your thoughts one day, arouses fear in many people, causing some of them sleepless nights and worries of a dystopian future.

They are also being told that AI will replace human workers. Think about this, after watching a video clip below of an AI humanoid malfunctioning. Think about it while you are on your way to undergo an eye operation, to save your sight, to be carried by an AI humanoid ‘surgeon’: Humanoid robot freaks out in viral clip, handler blames code error.

Like so many manufactured things in life, much of the power of AI and its potentiality is hype-driven and sold to the public as a kind of magic. I believe it is a superintelligence myth sold by some tech billionaires.

Time will tell if the AI bubble bursts and some humanoid robots start beating up seniors in old folks’ homes or a dentist humanoid robot ripping the head of a patient undergoing a tooth extraction.

As for the misinformed, weaponised language of climate change, author James Delingpole debunks the multi-billion-dollar myth:

Climate change is a normal, natural and perpetual process which occurs, and has always occurred, with sublime indifference to man’s puny input. Watermelons — JamesDelingpole.co.uk

The term ‘White privilege’ is also highly corrupt and weaponised (‘White’ mainly referring to Christians of European and Russian origin). One has only to look at photographs of extreme poverty in white communities during the Great Depression or the thousands of white people homeless living in tents on the streets.

In England during the late-1600s until the 19^th century, “climbing boys,” were employed to clean chimneys because of their small size which allowed them to fit into narrow flues, causing many health issues and fatalities.

Finally, there is the biggest misunderstood commentary in the 20^th and early decades of the 21^st century: The Bible. You hear people who are hostile to it say: “But the Bible was written by men, and you can’t trust the words of men (usually said by a man) on the meaning of life or God’s existence.”

This is a self-refuting statement, as it is being asked by a prone-to-fallibility human. Also, those men who wrote the Bible (prophets, Gospel writers, scribes, etc) were carrying out the instructions of Divine revelation by the Holy Spirit. An analogy would be to see these noble, holy men as ancient ‘stenographers’, inspired by God.

Isiah certainly wasn’t some ancient nomadic desert rapper, shaking his fist at the sky and ranting about his personal world view and disdain for human folly.

Also: “The Bible is incompatible with science.” Incorrect. The Bible is compatible with authentic science and not the current, corrupt pseudo “scientism” that is rampant today. Always remember: Sticks and stones may break your bones, but corrupted-weaponised words in the tyrannical socio-secular narrative can mentally hurt you, and cancel you, ruin your career, ostracise you, and much more.