Oxford Mathematician: Atheism Detracts from ScienceThe problem, as John Lennox sees it, is that atheism does not provide grounds for believing in rationality
Today, Evolution News and Science Today published an excerpt from Oxford mathematician John Lennox’s 2084: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humanity (Zondervan 2020): in which Lennox discusses some of the ways in which atheism detracts from science:
Science proceeds on the basis of the assumption that the universe is, at least to a certain extent, accessible to the human mind. No science can be done without the scientist believing this, so it is important to ask for grounds for this belief. Atheism gives us none, since it posits a mindless, unguided origin of the universe’s life and consciousness.John Lennox, “Why Science and Atheism Don’t Mix” at Evolution News and Science Today:
He offers physicist John Polkinghorne’s explanation of the difficulty:
“Thought is replaced by electrochemical neural events. Two such events cannot confront each other in rational discourse. They are neither right nor wrong. They simply happen . . . The world of rational discourse dissolves into the absurd chatter of firing synapses. Quite frankly that cannot be right and none of us believes it to be so.”John Lennox, “Why Science and Atheism Don’t Mix” at Evolution News and Science Today:
You can read the rest of the free excerpt here.
You may also enjoy:
In Dan Brown’s AI hype novel, the hero stumbles onto God. Not clear that was supposed to happen but stories do get away on their authors at times… Oxford mathematician John Lennox: Utterly fascinating. Someone who’s trying to bring down religion by the use of AI is actually heightening evidence for the existence of God.
Exclusive!: John Lennox answers our questions about AI in 2084. He doubts that AI, now or then, will out-think humans. Our real worry is how it will be used.