Mind Matters Natural and Artificial Intelligence News and Analysis
complexity-concept-complex-problem-solution-confused-busines-1218844069-stockpack-adobestock
Complexity concept, complex problem solution, confused business man looking for solution, understanding and clarity about complex problem, brainstorm
Image Credit: Martinesku - Adobe Stock

Exploring the Immaterial Aspects of Thought and Understanding

Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email
Duration
1 hour, 37 minutes, 43 seconds
Download
Audio File (134 MB)

Today, Dr. Selmer Bringsjord joins guest host Pat Flynn to discuss a compelling argument for the immateriality of mathematical objects and the human person. It’s an argument Bringsjord develops in his chapter “Mathematical Objects Are Non-Physical, So We Are Too” in the book Minding the Brain. Building on the work of philosophers like James Ross and John Searle, the argument suggests that if formal thoughts and mathematical objects are non-physical, then the human person who can understand these things must also have an immaterial aspect. Dr. Bringsjord unpacks a unique perspective on the immateriality of the human person, focusing on our capacity for formal reasoning rather than consciousness or qualia. It’s all part of a fascinating philosophical case for the non-physicality of mathematical objects and the human mind.

Additional Resources


Enjoying our content?
Support the Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence and ensure that we can continue to produce high-quality and informative content on the benefits as well as the challenges raised by artificial intelligence (AI) in light of the enduring truth of human exceptionalism.

Exploring the Immaterial Aspects of Thought and Understanding