Mind Matters Natural and Artificial Intelligence News and Analysis
financial-technology-concept-with-humanoid-robot-analyze-sto-1304470757-stockpack-adobestock
Financial technology concept with humanoid robot analyze stock market
Image Credit: phonlamaiphoto - Adobe Stock

Turing Test 2.0: A Better Way to Test Machine Intelligence?

Share
Facebook
Twitter/X
LinkedIn
Flipboard
Print
Email
Duration
35 minutes, 21 seconds
Download
Audio File (49 MB)

On this episode of Mind Matters News, host Robert J. Marks speaks with Dr. Georgios Mappouras about his proposal for a more rigorous test for measuring artificial intelligence. Mappouras argues that the original Turing Test is not enough to determine true intelligence in AI systems, as it focuses too much on simulating human-like conversation rather than demonstrating genuine understanding and problem-solving abilities. Mappouras proposes that a true test of general intelligence should involve an AI system being able to take in non-functional information — information it does not yet know how to use — and then demonstrating the ability to extract new knowledge and functionality from that information, similar to how a human can derive new insights and capabilities from observing the world around them. He believes current AI systems have not yet passed this higher bar for general intelligence, and he is skeptical that large language models like ChatGPT have truly achieved human-level intelligence, despite their impressive natural language abilities.

Additional Resources


Enjoying our content?
Support the Walter Bradley Center for Natural and Artificial Intelligence and ensure that we can continue to produce high-quality and informative content on the benefits as well as the challenges raised by artificial intelligence (AI) in light of the enduring truth of human exceptionalism.

Turing Test 2.0: A Better Way to Test Machine Intelligence?